Christopher Columbus: A Legacy of Destruction?
Most Columbus Days are marked by rabid condemnations of the
explorer as a genocidal maniac bent on destroying the peaceful
and innocent native peoples who populated the Caribbean islands
which Columbus discovered. These condemnations are not only
unwarranted but indicative of the hatred those delivering them
have for all that Columbus stood for and brought to the
primitive New World. He has been unfairly demonized by
politically correct and Marxist historians like Howard Zinn and
others.
Two myths regarding Columbus to dispel quickly are 1)
that everyone thought the world was flat while he thought it was
round and 2) that the legacy of Columbus was one of death and
destruction.
Columbus and everyone else who was educated in Europe knew
the Earth was round, a fact which had been proven by the Ancient
Greeks. What Columbus got wrong was the circumference of the
Earth, causing him to think he could sail from Europe to Asia
going west, which of course you can, but lucky for him the
Americas were in his way or he would have ended up starving.
The legacy of Columbus was not death and destruction. Most
Indian deaths were caused by the introduction of diseases that
the Europeans brought with them unwittingly. It must also be
remembered that the Indians living in the Americas were largely
primitive Stone Age level savages who advanced little in the
thousands of years they inhabited North and South America. [1]
The two built up "civilizations" of the Americas, those of the
Incas and the Aztecs, were hardly much better, being built upon
irrationality, human sacrifice, and brutal primitivism.
Contrary to the myth of the peaceful natives who Europe
unleashed war upon, warfare existed in plenty before Columbus
arrived and it continued as the Indians clashed with the
European explorers and each other. When Cortes and Pizzaro
arrived there were tribes, held in tributary bondage to both the
Aztec and Incas, that were more than willing to help in toppling
theses "thriving civilizations." [2]
It's always asserted that we, like Columbus, stole the land
of the Indians. This seems dubious considering the nomadic
nature of many of the peoples he encountered and their lack of
private property or organized settlements.
What was there to steal?
The land was not in use, evidenced by the pathetic level of any
kind of progress, intellectual or material, on the part of
nearly all Indian tribes despite thousands of years in lands of
great plenty and separated from the other people of the world
who could have potentially meddled with them.
What is the true legacy of Columbus? We are. The Discovery of
the New World allowed people to start anew away from the
absolutist and mercantilist kingdoms of Europe.
All the ideas upon which our country was predicated
individual rights, capitalism and limited republican government,
were allowed to flourish in an environment far away from the
Kings and aristocrats of the Old World.
The Indians, forced either to join civilization or cling to
their primitive savagery, became as the nomadic barbarians of
the Old World. But unlike their Old World counterparts, the
ridiculously low development of Indian "civilization" in
comparison to that of the Europeans and the later colonists
didn't allow them to have the same devastating effects the Huns,
Mongols, Vikings, Vandals, and others had had. As a result their
tribal primitivism and mystical world view was supplanted by the
budding fruits of human reason which eventually led to the
foundation of the American Republic.
Why are the condemnations of Columbus so visceral and
continual year after year? We're told in college that "all
cultures are equal" and that to prefer our culture over any
other is "ethnocentrism." This is absurd. If all cultures are
equal then why do people move, predominantly, to prospering
societies as opposed to tribal primitive Indian-type societies?
The answer is simply that not all cultures are equal. Some
cultures are, indeed, better than others.
But the goal of such bromides as "all cultures are equal" is
to tear down cultures like ours which are, by every objective standard, far better than the savage primitives out in the
middle of forests and oceans who eat other people, or sacrifice
them to the sun or volcanoes, or practice any other absurdity.
Humans, having the ability to reason, are in a unique
position to prosper far more successfully than any other animal.
Columbus was the harbinger of reason for the New World which was
devoid of it, a situation which was inexcusable.
Similarly, any defense of the pre-Columbus condition is
glorifying perpetual irrational primitivism and death while
condemning the introduction of reason and the ideas that flowed
from it. Columbus is thus cursed when in fact he should be
thanked, not only by us, but by the descendents of the Indians
who escaped conditions that, barely better than death, their
ancestors experienced millennia after millennia.
Thank you Christopher Columbus.
This article was authored By Alexander
Marriott and is reprinted here by permission.
[1] This, of course is not an issue of race. Much like
Christian Europe after the fall of Rome until Thomas Aquinas was
populated almost exclusively by savages, most of whom were
white. They were entirely mystical and backward, much like the
Indians of North and South America. Vikings, Huns, and the
Germanic tribes that invaded the western half of the Roman
Empire were all savages also and they were mostly or entirely
white as well. Savagery is the result of persistent individual
choice to do nothing and refusing to think. It is caused by the
constant individual acceptance of irrationalism and mysticism
that has absolutely nothing to do with skin color, location, or
ancestry. It was the state of all humans, white, black, brown,
and red, for most of human history--if you go back far enough
all of our ancestors were savages. It took the actions of
individuals to reason things out consistently from one
generation to the next, bringing themselves out of stone-age
primitivism.
[2] Columbus, like most of the men of his day, accepted the
idea of slavery and so he did enslave Indians. This was highly
immoral and is a blight upon his record, but, to be fair, the
Indians themselves took slaves amongst their various tribes,
usually in the form of tributes.
Most Popular Articles
Did Christopher Columbus
Discover The New World?
Christopher Columbus: A Legacy of Destruction?
According to the Bahamas Tourism office the Islands of the Bahamas is
unique with their individual character and charm--and there is some
truth to this.
Visit the main islands like beautiful
Grand Bahama Island (Freeport/Lucaya) and bustling
New Providence (Nassau and Paradise Island).
Or, if you really want to get away from the crowds, visit one of the many out islands like
Abaco,
Andros,
Acklins and Crooked Island,
Biminis,
Berry Islands,
Cat Island,
Eleuthera,
Exumas,
Inaguas,
Mayaguana, and
San Salvador.
Whether you need information on
alcohol,
camping, and our wonderful climate, or want to know about our
currency, and
education system, our rich
history and
immigration policies. The Bahamas Guide Facts and Figures section should have what you are looking for.
|
Talk, ask questions, and discuss the Bahamas for free on our online
Bahamas Discussion Boards. |
Opportunity to win great vacation prizes. Learn more
about The Bahamas
Guide Sweepstakes! |
Get the inside scoop on the latest deals, breaking news,
and security alerts by signing up for our email newsletter. |
|